Skip to content
info@evidologygroup.com

Are You Talking to the Right Customer?

Share This Post:

I’ve been building up to this blog for a few weeks now, and I have to get something off my chest. I can’t tell you how many B2B tech companies I’ve met with that get this wrong. Deadly wrong. So wrong that it can – and in many cases has killed companies. How do you pick a target market?


Here are three common high-risk approaches that we run into all the time:

  1. First-Past-The-Post: Try a few different segments in parallel based on gut feel. See which one gets traction. Then double down on that segment.
  2. Trial and Error: Try one segment. See if it gets any traction. If that doesn’t work, try a different segment.
  3. Come One, Come All: Go after all segments at once because, after all, everyone will want our product.


All these approaches consume a lot of precious time, brain-power and money, undermining the confidence of your employees, Board and investors.

Instead, I encourage you to take an evidence-based approach supported by a structured decision-making framework. This doesn’t have to be heavy-weight, but I assure you that investing in a well-informed decision up-front will pay dividends down the road. Let’s explore how to use the SPADE framework that we introduced in our last blog and overlay Evidology’s evidence-based framework.


Situation

 

  • We need to decide which market segment to target with company resources
  • We need to decide two months from today
  • We want to select a segment that is friendly to new technology adoption and has similar technical requirements to adjacent industry segments. We don’t have any year-1 revenue targets from our first segment but we do want to:
    (a) learn,
    (b) harden our product in a real-world environment, and
    (c) secure good reference customers. We want revenues of at least $1M in year 2 from that lead segment. (Note that it doesn’t have to be a big market, just an accessible market at this stage.)


People

 

  • Responsible: VP Product Management
  • Approver: CEO
  • Consulted: Marketing Manager, CTO, VP Engineering, CEO, Advisor/Mentor
  • Informed: All staff, Board of Directors.


Alternatives

 

  • Hold a brainstorming meeting to lay out possible target markets and a description of each segment. List examples of possible friendly companies that are representative of each segment
  • Define the assessment criteria you’ll use to evaluate each segment
  • Complete the Customer Canvas and Conversation Plan
  • Collect real-world evidence for each segment via customer interviews.


Decision

 

  • Regroup the Responsible and Consulted individuals to summarize findings and make a decision based on the assessment criteria
  • Bring the recommendation to the Approver and walk through the approach and findings.


Explanation

 

  • Communicate the methodology and conclusion to the Informed parties.


It could take anywhere between one and three months to collect the necessary input from stakeholders across the various market segments. The customer conversation process will help create a relationship with potential lead customers which, in turn, will help propel your sales/partnership journey and the validation you need for your next financing round.


For more on our Evidence-Based methodology and help securing your lead customer, please contact the Evidology Group.

More To Explore

Ready to Hire Your First Salesperson?

Many technical founders I’ve met with are either getting ready to hire their first salesperson or they’re frustrated with what feels like a revolving door of underperforming salespeople. What gives? Perhaps one of the most fundamental mistakes that technical Founders make is to focus on evangelizing the vision and building the product. Then, when the product approaches MVP-ready, the Founder hires a salesperson to bring in the customers. DON’T MAKE THIS MISTAKE. Sadly, this usually ends in frustration, lost time, poor employee morale and degraded investor confidence. It is one of the most common downfalls of many promising new businesses. Just as any new product goes through a beta phase followed by a production phase, I strongly encourage a phased sales process. Phase 1:  Partnership During the partnership phase, an individual (usually the Founder, CTO, CEO or perhaps even a Business Development person) is responsible for ongoing engagement with prospective customers from the concept validation phase onwards. This person is responsible for learning what’s important to the customer and how they would buy/use a new solution such as yours. You’re also freely sharing your company’s expertise with your partner to help them solve an important problem. Most importantly, this individual is responsible for closing initial customers and learning how they buy. Phase 2: Sales Armed with several happy, reference customers and a basic understanding of the buying process, you’re ready to hire a professional salesperson who is responsible for accelerating customer acquisition, learning more about how they buy and building a repeatable sales process. Only when that process is understood and you have good product/market fit, should you grow your sales team to scale. Of course, there’s a lot to unpack in these two phases, and we’ll do that in a series of upcoming blogs. Whether you’re in the Partnership phase, getting ready to hire your first salesperson or you’re frustrated with disappointing sales traction, contact us and we can help get you back on track.

Read More »
April 8, 2020

How Do You Make Better Decisions Faster?

Life as a Founder or product owner is filled with daily decisions to test your leadership – each could make or break your business. In this blog, I’d like to share an excellent framework for your most important decisions. Next week, we’ll talk about how you can apply this tool in a GoToMarket context. In my previous companies, we had a favourite expression that the quality of the decision was directly proportional to the quality of the debate. Stay factual and share your perspective in a respectful and trusting environment – never ever let the discussion get personal. I’m a particular fan of Gokul Rajaram’s SPADE framework that he created many years ago while at Square. It’s simple, easy to apply, and it touches on the important aspects of leadership such as consultation and communication. Moreover, it’s structured enough that you can easily build it into your company culture. In retrospect, we had been following a very similar approach ourselves, in our companies albeit not as formalized. Gokul has conveniently productized the SPADE framework in a handy SaaS offering, that allows distributed organizations to improve their decision-making. SPADE is an acronym for Situation, People, Alternatives, Decision and Explanation. Let’s look at each of the five steps. (I should point out that I’ve made some minor modifications to Gokul’s framework and have simply highlighted those changes with an “*”.) Situation* The start of every decision is a question that needs to be answered such as Which market segment should we pursue? What should we name this product? Set a deadline so that decisions don’t drag on Spell out your criteria to measure success (targets, metrics, objectives and constraints)* People Responsible: Who is responsible for the decision and the execution of the decision? This person typically leads the SPADE process Approver: Who is ultimately responsible for approving the decision? According to Gokul, “Typically, the approver does not vote down the decision itself, rather they veto the quality of the decision” Consulted: Who has a perspective and valuable input that should be included in the decision-making process? Informed: Who should be informed of the decision-making process and outcome* Alternatives Brainstorm to generate a comprehensive set of feasible alternatives For each alternative, list out the pros and cons. Be quantitative and draw on evidence wherever possible. Draw on relative benefits such as High/Medium/Low and consider weighting based on importance Explore ways to mitigate the risk Consider assigning probabilities to possible outcomes for each alternative* Decision Form a recommendation by presenting the alternatives to the team, asking for their feedback and taking people’s input into consideration. On contentious topics, a private vote may be effective Run your recommendation and the process by the Approver Explanation Hold a Commitment Meeting with key stakeholders to communicate the decision. It is paramount that once a decision is made, everybody supports the decision and the whole company pulls in the same direction Prepare a 1-page outline that summarizes the SPADE behind the decision and communicate it to those tagged as “informed” in the People step I believe that tools such as the SPADE framework can help you make better decisions faster with stronger buy-in from your whole team and your Board. Incorporate a decision-making framework like this into your company culture and I think you’ll find your business will be better for it. For more on our Evidence-Based methodology or for help on your Sales and Marketing strategy, please contact us directly.

Read More »
May 26, 2020

Subscribe to Our Blog

Subscribe to our blog and find out about our upcoming webinars.

No thanks.